Union Pier plan should honor Mosquito Fleet’s legacy by Whitney Powers

The following is an excerpt from a Post and Courier article published March 12, 2023


When I read in the recent commentary by Barbara Melvin, CEO of the State Ports Authority, that the Union Pier master plan will recognize the historic Mosquito Fleet and its African American fishermen with “new opportunities to fish on the harbor,” this seemingly generous gesture rang hollow.

In “Southern Provisions” by University of South Carolina professor David Shields, he introduces the free black man Charles Leslie, whose diligent, thorough research determined the varieties of seasonal, local fish that were viable for catch by Mosquito Fleet fishermen in the late 1860s until well into the 20th century.

This established the Mosquito Fleet as the earliest purveyors of fish acceptable for the tables of the poor and rich, the latter having fancied cod from northern fisheries through the mid-19th century.

The legacy of the Mosquito Fleet has been slowly eradicated by the South Carolina State Ports Authority, first by moving the fleet from the base of the market and then, eventually, fencing off the water access that these fishermen used north of the current terminal pier.

Any potential for this to be recognized as a nationally significant site, on the order of Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco, is in jeopardy with this plan.

It is critical to our history that property is available as part of Union Pier’s waterfront to appropriately honor this legacy with similar interpretive possibilities such as water access, boat building and other educational opportunities.

Merely providing a plaque at a fishing pier would only further erase the real economic contributions made by Mr. Leslie and the Mosquito Fleet to our current booming restaurant and seafood industries.

WHITNEY POWERS

Charleston


What are unique challenges, opportunities at Union Pier? by Whitney Powers

The following was published in the Post and Courier on November, 27, 2022

by Whitney Powers


Discussion about the Union Pier redevelopment plan has largely focused on the buildings and such to be constructed on the 40 acres of high ground and ideas such as smaller lots sizes and buildings that reflect the granular and diverse character of the city.

But we tend to overlook how truly significant it is to contemplate the future for the last 30 acres of undeveloped waterfront on the peninsula. This really is the final opportunity for Charleston residents to gain physical access to the historic waterfront without obtaining membership in a private club or residency in an adjacent building or negotiating through a boat ramp or marina or getting a seat in a waterfront restaurant. It could even be argued that focusing on this public space could better inform the future building fabric than attempts to codify the architecture.

Unfortunately, what has been proposed reflects the trend that the Madrid-based urban planner Alvaro Sevilla-Buitrago cautioned against earlier this year: “Public administrations collaborate with private actors, corporate sponsors, and groups of middle- and upper-class gentrifiers to promote sterile projects that create sanitized public space commons and consumption centered conviviality to attract high-income households, tourists, and potential customers.”

Perhaps it is too much to expect something other than plans driven by maximum profitability. However, we shouldn’t accept sacrificing the immediacy of the waterfront for a 1,200-linear-foot berth for cruise ships or yet another marina to limit public water access on the peninsula.

What is really needed for this area is shared infrastructure that transcends a short-sighted, expedient template as well as something that optimistically looks forward for the sake of future generations who may live here. As was done with the redevelopment of Marion Square, world-class practitioners and their creative examples can guide our thinking by asking: What are the unique challenges and opportunities here?

We should account for how this area manages tides and climate change, is a waterfront biome and supports existing structures. Consider the work of landscape architect Kate Orff of SCAPE, who offers a vast portfolio of urban waterfront rehabilitation and development projects around New York and other coastal urban areas where ecology serves as infrastructure, flood control and entire planting structures that invite public engagement.

We should acknowledge the port’s breadth of history. And while a nod to the mistreated Mosquito Fleet is a welcome offer in the plan, what about others? Architect Jeanne Gang of Studio Gang has been the project leader for redevelopment of the Memphis riverfront’s 30-acre (just like Union Pier) Tom Lee Park, now under construction. Long ago named for a black fisherman who saved more than 30 people from the Mississippi River after a riverboat steamer sank, the redeveloped park acknowledges the floodplain, includes several active areas and landscaped conditions that address the challenges of the levee system, and creatively connects to the historic downtown grid. The project team also includes artist Theaster Gates, whose proposed work there has been funded through the Mellon Foundation’s Monument Project.

Global efforts provide other possibilities. Examples found in the April 2019 edition of the UK magazine Architectural Review highlighting pier redevelopment projects include:

  • Disembarkation of cruise ships routed below the waterfront park terrace in Yokohama, Japan, therefore bypassing the need for tourism infrastructure within the park.

  • Redevelopment of Pier 2 in San Francisco as the Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture.

  • A swimming pool created within the context of the pier system for Aarhus, Denmark.

  • Renovations to the historic St. Petersburg, Florida, railroad access pier as a proposed mixed-use project featuring restaurants, cafes and fishing decks along with boating, swimming and shopping facilities.

So far, the lack of any focus on the waterfront would suggest that the city will be blindsided if the current iteration of the Union Pier plan is accepted as is. The city must claim its interests in more ways than scrutinizing the architectural expressions on the built portion of the site. It must counter the deal that’s been struck so that the waterfront pier is not demolished or monetized away from the public.

We should not accept a plan that doesn’t put the community’s interest ahead of the developer’s, who not only is being paid to create a master plan, but stands to gain even if the parcels are developed by others.

Whitney Powers is an architect and Charleston resident.

Corrigan Gallery review by Whitney Powers

Maura Hogan has written a profile on the Corrigan Gallery at 38 Queen St, Charleston published in the Post and Courier. This article details the history and personality of the gallery and it’s owner, Lese Corrigan. Hogan describes in detail how Studio A helped design a renovation for the space that balances functional, aesthetic, and historic concerns.

Check it out here

Hoban isn’t the architect Charleston should single out for special praise by Whitney Powers

The following was published in the Post and Courier on May, 21, 2022

by Whitney Powers


Many in Charleston’s preservation community embraced the recent recognition of 18th century Irish architect James Hoban and his contributions to the city’s architecture.

While some recognition is due, it is important to note that both Hoban’s design for the Charleston County Courthouse and the White House are versions of the Leinster House in Dublin. Obviously, these late 18th century efforts did little to reinforce the new country’s post-revolutionary zeal and, in Charleston, may have been efforts that reflected some ambivalence to newfound or expected freedoms.

It is Benjamin Henry Latrobe, the first professional architect in the United States, who deserves far more recognition. Latrobe emigrated to the United States specifically to engage in the new country’s expressive architectural possibilities. His association with President Thomas Jefferson led to his post as surveyor of public buildings and eventually as the second architect of the capitol.

Latrobe’s architectural contributions include adding the iconic north and south porticos to Hoban’s White House design and re-designing and overseeing construction of the Capitol building, originally proposed by Dr. William Thornton. Architectural historian Jeffrey Cohen described the Capitol revisions this way: “A building graced by (Latrobe’s) segmental geometries and practical vaulting, it explained itself without theatricality and ostentation. The Capitol expressed democracy physically.”

A decade later, Jefferson sought Latrobe’s opinion for his vision of an “academical village” for the University in Virginia. The correspondence from Latrobe included his now-executed designs for Pavilions VIII and IX, and a suggestion for the addition of a “Center building which ought to exhibit … Mass and details.” Jefferson’s response was to anchor his academy with a domed cylindrical library, the Rotunda.

Latrobe’s commitment to the ideals of the new country was manifested in four central themes to distinguish its architecture:

  • Responsiveness to climate, which varied widely throughout the country, including protection from elements and natural lighting through skylights.

  • Transition space between inside and outside, serving to filter people as they arrived, depending on their business at a particular location.

  • Movement or circulation throughout interior spaces allowing one to have views in different directions and through other spaces.

  • Abandonment of derivations from France or England, opting for ancient models such as those from Greece and Rome, to reflect philosophically independence.

These distinctive, democratic principles are reflected in significant work by Latrobe’s students in Charleston, including William Strickland, whose central building Randolph Hall anchors the College of Charleston campus much as the University of Virginia’s Rotunda, and the expressive dignity and simplicity of Robert Mills’ Fireproof Building and First Baptist Church.

I would argue, however, that it is the single-house piazza that demonstrates the most radical corresponding gesture to the nation’s repudiation of its colonial ties to England, one that is clearly demonstrative of Latrobe’s architectural principles.

Throughout the city, early Georgian and federal style buildings were reconfigured to accommodate the addition of a multi-storied side porch, and new buildings invariably included this feature. This singular element is representative of the nation’s democratic aspirations, one that was mutable in scale and detail based on the needs and desires of the residents, and ever present in hundreds of varying forms from the late 18th century through today’s Charleston.

We may never know exactly who saw the potential in a simple side porch as an expression of an ideal. Perhaps it was one of Latrobe’s students. Or maybe it was Major General Thomas Pinckney — one of Charleston’s “gentleman” architects and designer of the mansion at 14 George St., now Spoleto’s office. Maybe Pinckney was inspired after meeting Latrobe at the American Philosophical Society in Philadelphia. One might also consider that Charleston has never hesitated to venerate its ancestors so perhaps it was a woman or a slave, echoes of which may be seen in the East Side’s House of the Future by the artist David Hammons (with Albert Alston).

But the visual evidence is clear, and the piazza is a noteworthy symbol of the first flames of democracy in the United States. All you really must do is look around to see how diverse, practical, and revolutionary this simple gesture can be.

Whitney Powers founded the Charleston company Studio A Architecture and has served on the city’s Board of Architectural Review.

Highlights of 2015 by Whitney Powers

In a wrap-up of 2015, we kickoff our blog and news series. It's been a big year for Studio A with the spring devoted to historic renovations in Charleston's Cannonborough-Elliottborough neighborhood and at the Medical University campus, along with a sizable renovation in the Molasses Creek neighborhood of Mt. Pleasant. This fall we have new work

Read More